The Philosophy on the Legalization of Drugs Essay Example for Free

The Philosophy on the Legalization of Drugs Essay in that location ar many controversial topics being debated about in the United States. One topic close to often debated about is the legalization of drugs. Of course people have their own beliefs and opinions on the subject, only if atomic number 18 the line of merchandises discussed about actually valid? Is there enough evidence relievering the premises they claim? These are questions we should ask when observing the arguments people are presenting to defend their beliefs. I conceptualise that drugs should non be legalized for some(prenominal) reasons, simply as stated above, different people have different opinions. One of the arguments presented from the people who believe that drugs should be legalized is that the government should non interfere with peoples activities as long as it is not affecting other peoples rights. They state exactly, As far as morality is concerned, the finis to use or not use drugs is a p ersonal one that does not directly conflict upon the rights of others, and the government should never forbid activities that do not impinge upon the rights of others. I believe that there are many things wrong with this argument, but the main problem here is that there is no evidence to support the premise, therefore I see it as a false premise.I dont sympathise how they can say that drugs doesnt impinge upon the rights of others when there are drug related crimes happening any day. When people are high on drugs, their minds are altered. Many times while nether the allure of an illegal substance, people will commit crimes and put other peoples life in danger. This obviously affects the rights of others because people should not have to be put into danger because of other peoples activities.The legalization of drugs would make it much easily accessible, which in the end would run in more crimes and more people getting hurt. Another argument presented is that everything is tre acherous. They state Driving on the freeways in L. A. is very dangerous and leads to a good many deaths and injuries thus, it creates suffering in loved ones, and society as a satisfying is often called upon to pay for the medical expenses of those injured in accidents. The stopover is this if youre going to forbid drugs for the above reason, thus you ought to forbid anything which is in the least bit dangerous. This argument is questionable.Yes, it is true that everything is dangerous, but that is not the part of the argument that is under question. What it is thats under question in this argument is what theyre saying about baleful anything thats dangerous if theyre going to forbid drugs that are dangerous. It is true that everything is dangerous, but drugs are not only dangerous, but they are mind altering. If you go about your day and face dangers, being under the influence of drugs makes your dangers so much higher, because you are not in a stable state of mind. So with th is argument we must question the dangers of normal activities versus mind altering activities.The legalization of drugs will definitely result in more danger, and make regular activities dangerous. For example driving, it is illegal for people to drive under the influence, but if people are going to be high all the time, they will most likely not hesitate getting into a car to get to where they need. As they stated, driving is a dangerous activity. The point here is, driving under the influence is an even more dangerous activity. Drugs are not necessities, but in current times, driving is a necessity. We should continue to try and keep people safe by prohibiting the unnecessary dangers.