Critically discuss the ethical arguments for and against the Essay

Critic exclusivelyy discuss the ethical arguments for and against the legalisation of euthanasia - Essay lawsuitGenetic views strongly believe that life starts at fertilization stage whereas embryological views argue that life begins at the point of gestation (Gilbert, 2011 Blazer & Zimmer, 2005, pp. 1 20). As compared to genetic and embryological views, some people argue that life begins at birth (ibid). Regardless of how life starts, health care professionals are trained to conserve human being lives by alleviating their suffering whenever they are terminally bereavement. As much as possible, checkup care professionals should nurture the lives of the patients unless there is an advertise order stating that the patient instructed a do non resuscitate (DNR) decision in concert with the patients signature (Salmasy, Sood, & Ury, 2008). Death is the end part of the life cycle which nobody rout out avoid. Aside from a combination of pain, depression, and psychological disturba nces, the fact that the economic cost of medical intervention for terminally ill patients is very expensive for most people with average income increases the number of cases wherein a terminally ill patient would seek for medical assistance to end their lives at the soonest possible time. Euthanasia is all about intentional killing of a dependent human being, by act or omission, for the patients alleged legal benefits (Ciabal, 2003, p. 129). ... euthanasia is considered as good death since this option allows a terminally ill patient to live the last few minutes of their lives to a greater extent comfortable (ibid). Focusing on ethical cases whereby terminally ill patients are seeking for euthanasia, this report will discuss whether or not a terminally ill patient has the right to refuse medical treatment. In reference to the holiness of life and quality of life perspective, this report will discuss why life should be prioritized more than death. As part of going through the main di scussion, whether or not the patients have the right to take for an ineffective medical treatment will be answered together with the clinicians obligations to meet the patients request. After discussing the significance of advance directives in terminating the lives of terminally ill patients, some barriers that could prevent the patients from writing an advance directive will be identified and tackled in details. The Right of a Terminally Ill Patient to Refuse Medical discussion Under the informed consent guidelines, the doctors and nurses should properly inform the patients about the main purpose, advantages, and disadvantages of each prescribed medicine and other medical care intervention such as the use of life-sustaining treatment wish tube feeding devices, mechanical breathing ventilation and dialysis machines, and/or diagnosing devices like x-ray and CT scan (Kaufmann & Ruhli, 2010 Ganzini et al., 2003). On top of this, each medical care professional is also required to maintain and observe the patients autonomy by allowing them to make their personal decision when it comes to selecting the care and medical treatment they prefer (Walker, 2009 Stirrat & Gill, 2005). Given that each patient has the right to accept or not to